The Case For and Against UV filters

My recent question to the PhotoTakers forum

Generally I always take shots like this

CAMERA -> POLARISING FILTER -> SKYLIGHT FILTER

From what I understand every extra bit of glass (filter) added in front of a lens takes away some light so should I remove the polarising filter for dusk/ nightshots ?

Resulted in some conjecture, but the consensus from searching several sites was that any filter or glass in front of the lens degrades image sharpness (except for the filter manufacturer sites and, of course, they swear up and down they don’t). The consensus also says that the use of more than one filter at a time is a definite no-no and can cause all kinds of problems (chromatic aberrations, etc). Bottom line – pretty much everyone agrees that you should never put a filter on unless you need it.

However a minority did claim that using a UV (skylight) filter was still worth it to prevent the lens getting damaged, scratched or accidently finger printed, providing no other filter was being used at the same time.

One thought on “The Case For and Against UV filters”

  1. From my own experience I find leaving a polarizing filter on one of my identical cameras and a uv filter on the other meets my needs – I take a lot of night time or pre dawn shots and find that the polarizing filter left at a neutral position saturates the colour a little better than normal. I never combine two lens filters primarily because of something I read “if you ever cross thread them you have a serious problem” enjoy your site which I check out from time to time.

    Cheers John

    EDITOR: Nice to know you’re a regular reader John 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *